Chat GPT's owner claims 'Our goal is to ensure that all of humanity benefits from artificial general intelligence—AI systems that are generally smarter than humans.' Yes, AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) has the potential to empower everyone with tremendous new capabilities; imagine a world in which we all have access to assistance with practically any cognitive work, providing a significant force multiplier for human inventiveness and creativity.

We are still a long way from considering Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) to be a threat to humanity's survival. However, we cannot deny that AI is becoming smarter by the day. Machines are increasingly capable of making their own decisions and solving issues.

There is an impending strategy by OpenAI: ‘Introducing Super Alignment’
They are aiming for scientific and technological breakthroughs that will allow them to direct and manage AI systems that are far smarter than their Machine learning preprocessed algorithms. They are forming a new team, co-led by Ilya Sutskever and Jan Leike, to address this problem in four years.

Superintelligence will be the most impactful technology humanity has ever devised, and it may aid in the resolution of many of the world's most pressing issues. They plan to establish a nearly human-level automated alignment, after which they will employ massive quantities of computation to amplify their efforts and align superintelligence.

So, Which Method is More Intelligent? 
The answer is in the eye of the beholder. Do you believe that analytical thinking is more significant than creative solutions? These are personal questions, but one thing is certain: both humans and machines have strengths and flaws in intelligence.The argument between human intelligence and AI intelligence is continuing. Situational intelligence could be considered the deciding factor in this issue. Understanding when and how to apply AI or human thought processes to solve a given problem is what distinguishes us from machines. Knowing which will produce the best results will always be critical in this dialogue.